The second difference between design-build bridging and design-build involves the solicitation of fees and the standard of award for the contract. These bridging documents provide enough project requirements in preliminary drawings and specifications to enable design-build bidders to submit a responsive bid. The design criteria package acts as “bridging” documents between initial project concept and the design-build phase – hence the name of this construction method. The unit then solicits proposals from design-build firms based on the design criteria package and contracts with a design-builder to complete the design and perform construction. First, the unit contracts separately with an architect or engineer to design 35% of the project (referred to in the statute as the “design criteria” ). The design-build bridging construction method is a two-step process that differs from design-build in two significant ways. 143-128.1B, design-build bridging might be thought of as design-build “lite,” meaning it is a somewhat scaled-down version of design-build (“Great taste, less filling” for those who remember those ads).ĭesign-Build Bridging Compared to Design-Build 2013-401/H857 created not only a design-build construction contracting process, but also a construction contracting process called design-build bridging. My last post discussed the new design-build construction method authorized by the General Assembly during the 2013 Session.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |